Totally and completely deserving of an Unforgiveable Curse

I almost didn’t quite believe it when I heard it on NPR this morning. But a quick web search and, yes, it’s true. The New York Times obtained a copy of Deathly Hallows and has published a review of it — complete with plot points and spoilers.

(And no, I did not read it. Not even close.)

What a gross display of self-importance, duplicitous in its planning, insensitive in its delivery, and odious in its intent and meaning. There are several offenses. First, the acquisition of the book, which had to have come through somewhat secretive measures and probably included a generous payoff. This would be a forgivable offense if it had remained there; showing only the pretentiousness of the New York Times. Instead, a journalist read it and wrote a review. Again, they could have shown respect and held the review until the 21st. But, no, the Times showed no restraint and sent it to print days before the release. (I hope Scholastic finds a way to sue their asses.) The final repulsion is that the actual review itself contains plot points and spoilers. Ostentatiously proving to us all that THEY KNEW IT FIRST, before anyone else, because nothing is more important than their opinion of a new book. The actions show tremendous disrespect for a series that is so well-loved (most especially by children! Hello? CHILDREN!) and reads like an insolent triumph over the book publisher and the author.

It should not be too terribly difficult to discover the officials at the New York Times responsible for such assumptions of importance and vulgar indifference. They’ll be the ones wearing long sleeves in the summer’s heat, taking care that their right forearms aren’t exposed to show the Dark Marks burned upon them.